Horizon Innovations

Ideas are easy, implementation is hard

Linux

by

Thinkpad R61 to Thinkpad E595

Brothers from the same stable

A review, going from R61 to E595. This isn't strickly a comparision because they are very different laptops and there's about 14 years between them! However to see how far the laptop has come, what new, what's been left behind etc. In a way I've come to see them as brothers.

ThinkPad brothers

The ThinkPad E595

These are the basic specs:

  • The basic spec for this laptop I have here is:
  • CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700U with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx (8) @ 2.300GHz
  • GPU: AMD ATI 05:00.0 Picasso
  • AMD Radeon Vega graphics
  • 16Gb ram
  • 500Gb ssd NVME
  • A 15.1" display res 1920x1080 60hz
  • USB3, HDMI, USB C power in, Micro sdcard reader, ethernet & headphones.

Note: Battery internal and not unplugable, no CD drive (However space for second drive internally).
Comes with Windows 10 preinstalled.
Overall the build quality is good.
The screen has a metal (aliminium?) frame which makes is sturdy. The screen is bright and clear with the matt finish, which i prefer.
The keyboard is good, although not as good as the R61, but this could be that I'm not used to the feel of this one yet.
The main body is plastic which feel solid enough and doesn't really flex. It does get warm when used on your lap but not burning hot. I haven't opened it up, yet.
The presentation overall is quite plain and minimal, with only the iconic "ThinkPad", subtle "Lenovo" branding and few stickers. Comes in the usual matt black.
One thing I'll mention here is that after using a macbook pro with the back lit keyboard, this is something that should be here as standard and in this case lacking. If I can get one tht would word, I would definately upgrade, as there is no feature for dim lighting use.

ThinkPad Brothers
Red means I'm working!
Right side
Left Side
The Keyboard
The screen is very very good

The ThinkPad R61


The basic spec (upgraded from orignal)

  • CPU: Intel Core 2 duo T8100 (2) @2.101Ghz
  • Graphic : Intel mobile GM965/GL960
  • 4Gb ram (original 2Gb)
  • 500 Gb SSD
  • disply 14.1" Res - 1270x 780 50hz
  • USB2 Firewire, Powerin, pcimie, sdcard reader, cd/dvd player/burner (now not working), ethernet, headphone socket, mic socket, wifi no/off switch, mic on/off switch.
  • Replaced battery with larger one.

This is one solid workhorse! It has been bashed and dropped, tea & coffee split over it, and it continues to just get up and work. This little unit will become my backup just in case, and for some projects that require a long time computer usage, like compiling an android rom. Last time I tried that on this machine took 14 hours! I dread how long it would take now.
The build quality is solid with metal chassis in the base and metal frame for the screen. The screen, at the time was good and it still works well but a second screen of high deffinition and resolution is required for graphics or detailed work.
The keyboard - second to none. The R61 althgouh doesn't have the backlit keyboard (not around at the time) does have an led light in the screen houseing that shone onto the keyboard, making is usable in dim lighting conditions.
The overall presentation is again plain and minimal. The usual branding.

The R61 on top of the E595 shows size difference
The useful icons
Battery charged, power on, sleeping
Right side
Left Side
The keyboard
The screen
Power source

Moving from the R61 to the E595

I was wondering how to explain the differences and I thought the best way is explaining the usage and how some little things I am going to miss. One thing I really liked about the R61 was a small set of LED icon notifications just below the screen. These are for useful things like caps lock, num lock, hard drive in use, wifi in use, battery charging/discharging, power plugged in and on, and sleep mode. The E595 Has a bright LED in the num losk & Caps Lock keys, a red LED on the screen lid to show sleep (pulsing on/off) and solid red for laptop on, an LED on the power button, and an LED when the power is pluged in. The difference is on the R61, they were all in one place, on the E595, they are scattered all over the place.

The power cables are different to and although the USB C plug is now a standard, the connector does feel fragile compared to the original.

One of the most notable differences is the size. The R61 is chunky while the E595 is bigger length and bredth, thickness is a lot slimmer. And being bigger means a bigger screen!
What I do like about the E595 though is the bigger screen, the numberpad on the side and a more powerful processor & larger RAM to match. It's also a lot, lot lighter. The finish is similar with the matt black styling, smooth on the E595 and grippy on the R61.

Software

Both machines came with Windows (R61 - XP & E595 Win10).
With the R61 I kep Win XP on it for a while as there were some apps I had/used that could only run on XP. However, one of the first things I did was to shrink the Windows partition and install Simply Mepis (a Debian based distro) which became my standard for a long time. My old laptop, a Toshiba Satalitte (P3 700Mz, 192Mb Ram) would run Simply Mepis easily and out performed many P4's with 2Gb ram & XP! Through the years The R61 Has had Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, and a few others, and has performed well in every case. Having the Intel hardware made it easy to find the drivers.
The E595 ws booted to Windows10 just to see, but only until it wanted my info. Then it was shutdown and MXLinux installed. Along side is Obarun (and arch based Distro without systemd) and Linux Mint (for running one app only that isn't available for Linux - details in another post later). The only drawback with this laptop at the moment is that it's too new and the graphics has caused problems with some distros - Linux Mint 19 with kernel 5.3 give a black screen yet 5.0 works fine. Others I've tried - Antix Linux has X-server crash, as does some others. Installed and deleted: Calculate Linux works well and does Ubuntu 20.04 (which I do not recommend - another time), Fedora & OpenSuse (live USB only) work well too.

Conclusion

If I can find a couple of 4gb ddr2 sodimm modules I'll upgrade the R61 to the 8Gb Ram that it should have had from the beginning.
I do like the E959 a lot and I'm already enjoing using it, and will continue to enjoy exploring its capabilities.
Now to find some more projects to utilise the power of this machine...

Have you recently invested in a new machine? What was it and was it a good choice?

by

Escaping From Google

In the wake of Facebook data fiasco and Googles collection for their own end, I thought it would be an interesting project to see if it's possible to go Google free on Android, and Google free completely for my business. A lot of people use Google for a lot of things ranging from email to maps, drive (storage) to music and of course search.

In the wake of the passing of the AA bill through the Australian parliament, i have updated, amended and added to, to take this into account.

What are the replacements for the most common apps used and how does it effect the work flow?

One of the biggest hurdles to overcome is th idea that nearly all of Googles apps are integrated, they are connected to each other, and on Android, many apps use the Play Store (Google) notification system. Some apps have reduced functionality without the Google connection.

The Apps

Google Android PC/Mac/Linux
Search Duckduckgo/Smartpage  
Maps OSMAnd~ Openmaps
Gmail Protonmail/Tutanota  
Calendar Etar Lightning/Nextcloud
Drive Nextcloud/Mega.nz  
Chrome Waterfox/Via/Orfox (requires Tor) Brave  
Music Blackplayer/VLC VLC
Keep Markor Atom
Launcher Nova/ Lawnchair  
Message (SMS) Signal  
Photo Nextcloud/ Smugmug  
Doc’s Nextcloud/polaris office/Andropen office LibreOffice/ Openoffice
Password Keepass2android KeepassXC

 

And for Android itself: LineageOS is probably the most well known and has the most available supported devices. Mokee (needs some modding) or Resurrection Remix OS (more found on xda-developers.com) are also good and generally kept up to date. There are more specialised android remakes that are far more secure.
Replacing the Android system is the only way to take Google off your device. It is a lot easier to do now than before and some manufactures are friendlier than others with this.

As I've put a non standard (manufactures) Android on all my phones, for this review I use my Sony Xperia Z. It's not a new phone but still works well and the community support is outstanding.

The biggest part of Google is their free online apps that can sync across devices. It was revealed a while ago that they use AI bots to search through your email, docs etc for keywords so they can present you with more relevant advertising. I'm not keen on this. What to do about it? Well, most businesses these days have a website, which means they have a server. On my server I've installed an app called Nextcloud. Nextcloud can, with the aid of plugin and third party software do almost everything Google does, except look at your stuff, there is also an encryption plugin. Your calendars, photos, file storage, music and video streaming, encrypt it all, sync to all your devices and it's open source software (and it's free!).

Keepass is a password encryption storage system. Cross platform. Here will give you what is available https://keepass.info/download.html

Update:

As the new AA Bill is so invasive with it's powers (I'm not going to get political here) what can be done to protect yourself from spying eyes and keep your privacy?

I researched most of this a while back. Besides the above, if you have a server for your website, move it to a safe country like Switzerland. Then for your finance and communication, I'd suggest using an operating system from a USB stick. There are a number around, one that is most recommended is Tails (https://tails.boum.org/) as it comes with almost everything you need to stay safe. On their website they even have an installer to take the hassle away. I've used Tails and can recommend them. Along with ProtonVPN, you'd be good to go. This is a bit of a hurriedly finished post, so I'll be updating it over the next few weeks just to make sure I've covered everything.

Any questions or suggestions that I've missed are most welcome.

Stay safe 🙂

by

Linux for the Macbook?

           I have a Macbook Pro, which I enjoy using. Credit where credit is due, it is a good machine. I'm in two minds as to whether I'd get another, but this one ain't broke so I don't have to answer the question just yet! I also like OSX, mostly. There are some things I'm not keen on, but like my windows machine before, there are some things I cannot do on Linux, such as Logos Bible software.

On to the question of Linux for the Macbook. Which flavour to go for and why? I cut my teeth on Red Hat 7.1 (which I still have!) and moved to Debian via SimplyMepis. I have tried many others including Ubuntu. For those who are not sure about what I'm talking about there are some websites that go into more detail than I care to here, like Distrowatch.com. Fedora was first on the list so I tried that. It worked well and Fedora 20 is a great improvement over previous versions as this time it felt spritely and the update and package manger were also improved (compared with Fedora 17). But then came "systemd". This is the new init (basically boot up) system developed by some Red Hat developers to replace the existing aging init system. The problem with systemd is its mission creep. Its slowly becoming the "start" system for everything, and there are some things becoming dependant on it which (in my opinion) shouldn't be. The Unix philosophy is for lots of small bits to do things exceptionally well, so if one bit falls over or fails it doesn't take everything else with it. If any part of systemd falls over, it'll take the whole OS with it. Not good for mission critical systems.

          Unfortunately most of the Linux distros are moving this way, which is a real shame. So if not fedora then what? Of the main Linux flavours it would appear that Debian and Ubuntu offer long term support versions which don't have systemd, so I've gone for Xubuntu LTS (14.04). This will use upstart init system for its lifetime and hopefully by then the mess of systemd will be sorted and Ubuntu might see sense and open source upstart! Even with this I noticed there were "systemd" patches installed to allow apps dependant on systemd to work with upstart. Sort of leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

          Ubuntu and therefore Xubuntu installs easily along side OSX. The only thing to remember is OSX likes to have space between partitions and without these OSX wont upgrade, but it appears the Xubuntu install takes this into account - a nice touch. Once installed it just remains to reconfigure "refit" so Xubuntu can boot. Proprietary drivers are required for the Broadcom wireless connection and Nvidia for the graphics which Xubuntu has you covered - just install and go! Easy.

         And as far as the work I do on the Macbook is concerned, I use mainly Linux and then only OSX when I have too. Its good to have it around. I would love to go fully open source but some of the stuff just isn't ready yet. I don't think its too far away now.
Next: to configure Xubuntu for developing Android roms for the Asus TF201.

by

My system crashed

My System Crashed!

I decided to install the Microsoft service pack 3 which went fine until I rebooted, then all mayhem broke loose. Windows XP booted to an unuseable system. I was not pleased. I was not ammused. My Linux partitions worked fine but were now under threat because the only way I could see to remedy this situation was to use the recovery disks I had made when I first bought this laptop. The recovery system reformats the whole disk, so everything goes, which is a real pain as all I needed to do was reinstall windows.

So after backing-up everytthing I went for the recovery disks. Doing this alowed me to re-think and re-organise the hard drive so as to have two large data partitions, an “everyday” partition, a “work” partition and a “ test partition”. So the hard drive would have XP (cos I have to have for my studies), SimplyMepis as the everyday system, Debian Lenny as the work system and Sidux as the test system. As you might of guessed, I like Debian. “And Ubuntu?” I hear you ask. No I don't like Ubuntu as after each 6 months its like doing an install with a new system and you never know what you are going to get. Will it work fully or not? Enough of Ubuntu before I say too much and this becomes something its not meant to be!

So I did a recovery and reinstalled XP and all my favorite applications, which took the best part of 4 hours, and I'm still not finished. On the other side, installing Mepis, Sidux and Debian together took one and a half hours and an extra half hour to set-up java, flash and networking.

Sidux

Sidux was the first to go on. I decided to use Sidux bescause as I'm using debian as my main workspace Sidux will give me advace notice as to what is coming up and how well it works and do I need it. Sidux is also very fast and therefore should be good for working on batery, we'll see. Sidux use kde, kde-lite or xfce desktops. Kde-lite was chosen so there is maximum choice as to what else is installed, almost like a minimum graffical install. I wish someone would do this for Gnome, a Gnome-lite. I live in hope!

Debian

Debian was next, even with the old text driven installer, there was a strange sence of comfort that I was installing an old friend. All went smoothly. The only thing I had to do was to connect to the internet through a wire the retreive the wireless drivers. After that all is sweet. I've added the Mepis repos and Mepis Community repos too and installed some of the latest applications that the Mepis community have put there.

I've also installed openbox window manager to replace the standard metacity window manager. This speeds up an already speedy laptop. The lastest wine and the free Crosover is also installed, with which I now have Dreamweaver MX and Flash MX running fine. All I need now is a way of getting Photoshop CS3 working... (these applications are needed for my sstudies, although I am also using Gimp, inkscape, and Quanta).

SimplyMepis

I must say to start with, I like Mepis. It isn't prefect (it uses kde as its desktop) but underneath it is good and I quite like Warren's views as to what a distro should be. I also like the way that a communty has gathered round and started using their skills and enthusiasm to help ans improve the(ir) distro. I first used SimplyMepis a few years ago when the Gnome desktop was supported along with Kde, this choice I liked as after trying a few desktops I prefer Gnome and fvwm. Mepis was installed last. All went smoothly and it found all the network cards automatically. I've setup gnome with openbox and fvwm-crystal as main deskops.

Ubuntu

In recent days I swapped Sidux for Ubuntu because I'd read that some people think its the best thing since sliced bread and as I hadn't tried it for a while, I thought I'd give it a go. My conclusions are that some apps are old or out of date for what I need, think wine, and there was something about it that just didn't feel right. At the moment I can't put my finger on it, but there is something about it that makes me uncomfortable using it.

I have re-installed Sidux.

Grub

I have configured Grub to run from the Mepis partition and also from each partition so when booting up I have a choice of either the relevant kernel for the different systems or a link to a more specific menu for that partition. This alows me to update and upgrade the kernel and not have to manually update grub each time..

Desktop

I am using Gnome with openbox as the main desktop except for Sidux where it'll run kde-lite. On all there is FVWM and FVWM-crystal. I have found that these two desktops with rox-filer rather intriging. I will be working on these as a side line just to see what they can do. One of the reasons I moved to Linux was that I felt that windows was becoming bloated and therefore slow, and I feel kde and gnome have been following this trait. I have a Toshiba laptop with 192meg ram, which runs linux very nicely, but I can't run suse or fedora for the memory is too small for them. It can however run debian. FVWM (and crytal) are very light-weight. Just because more memory is available and becoming cheaper doesn't mean you should use it. Just because a car can do 150 miles per hour doesn't mean you should. I am using openoffice to write this and was thinking about how many of the tools and facilities availble to use I use. Very few. If openoffice made it modular so you only installed what was needed, then its “memory footprint” would be reduced.

I have also started looking at windowmaker. Amother lightweight desktop window manager. This is easier to configure than FVWM and the eye-candy is interesting.

Conclusions

I think the reason I'm not sure about Ubuntu si that it apears to be more of a fork of Debian rather than based upon. With other Debian based distros you can install various packages from either onto either, Mepis to Debian and Debian to Mepis, and it will not break, but with Ubuntu it is different. If you install an Ubuntu package onto a Debian system, you are likely to break it (personal experence), and from Debian to Ubuntu it might not work, even though Ubuntu uses the .deb package. A little bit like eing locked into the ubuntu system (reminds me of someone from Redmond). Shame. I will state here that I do understand that Ubuntu does contrbute back to Debian upstream.

Mepis is good and stable. The community continues to develop around it, although I have noticed some growing pains, but I think these are healthy. If the community continues to grow strongly and Warren continues to head it, I think Mepis could become better and easier than Ubuntu because it is made by users for users rather than developers.

Debian is the old trustworthy. Solid and dependable.

Sidux is fast and challanging.

I have been writing this over the last few weeks and keep adding to it on an almost daily basis, so I will publish now and post updates as to how I get on with the different desktops an which one I stick with.

Update: I've just installed Fedora 10 and I'm impressed...

by

Puppy Linux

There has been a bit of talk lately about Puppy Linux in the media, well, when I say media, I mean the media I read! So I thought I write my bit. I came across Puppy Linux quite a while back, I think it was in 2003, but it might of been 2004. Anyway, I found it interesting because it could do so much but packed into such a small package, a bit like DML, but more user friendly and more intuitive for those dragged up on windows. I also found that it didn't quite work well enough on my hardware of the time, a Toshiba laptop. I also liked the idea of making your own custom version, a bit like "Pimp my Puppy", but never got round to doing it as I didn't have the time. Another curious character of Puppy Linux was that it is developed in Australia. When I found this out, I understood some of its quirks! I have been to Australia and found they do things slightly different there, which is good. So Puppy Linux is different. Now with version 4.1 I have found it to be really useful. With mounting of drives and partitions and a partitioning tools along with anti-virus tools makes this distro a must have in my "help" box of cd's. I've already helped out a couple of colleagues at work with it and I'm sure a few more will be helped out in the near future. Running Puppy Linux is a breeze from boot up through to desktop going through a keyboard config (which is straight forward) and a display config ( which I wish did an auto test before moving on) which isn't as straight forward for someone without any knowledge of computers. Then comes setting up the internet connection. Again, for me quite straight forward, but for someone with limited knowledge of computers, they could become stuck... for a while. The wizard is good though and does explain everything well. (If only I'd read before trying!). Once up to desktop, everything is to hand and Puppy Linux zipps along at a good pace. I have a P3 700 Mhz machine with 192 Meg ram and this with Puppy will give a Core duo 1.6GHz with 1 Gig ram a rum for it money with debian Linux, and blows it out of the water with windoze. Personally, if you have an old PC or laptop that you'd like to get going and use or give away, Puppy is a way of doing this with a touch of style.

Technorati:

Powered by Bleezer

by

The Friday Letter – XP, Vista or Linux or Mac

My father-in-law is staying with us for a while. He decided to buy a laptop. After looking around he went for a Toshiba P300. A good big 17 inch laptop. It came with Vista, but he wanted XP on it. Why? Two reasons, firstly because he was going to run some heavy software and didn't want Vista getting in the way, and secondly, familiarity. He knows XP and is happy with it.

One day, he might see the light and move over to Linux! The Mac didn't have a look-in for several reasons. Its expensive for what it is. The Mac ties you into its brand, more so than Microsoft. And its unfamiliar. And the same with Linux for him is that it is unknown territory.

One thing that amazed me was when starting the machine (the P300) and booting into Vista, it had to reboot 8 times before we reached the usable desktop. Overall it took four and a half hours to back up Vista and then install XP and the extra standard applications like Firefox, Thunderbird, Openoffice3, AVG antivirus and Zonealarm firewall.

For me it is a different story. I came across Linux a few years back with a tripple cd pack on a magazine of Red Hat 7.3 and haven't looked back. I can even run Linux in a window on XP from a USB stick. I now have a Lenovo R61 laptop. I do have XP on it but only because I am doing some studying and some of the software provided only runs on MS XP. I also have Linux on it. It is running Debian Lenny, which was so easy to install and get going. I had a full system up and running with the hour. Try that with XP or even Vista. I also have SimplyMepis8, which again was a dream to set up, and soon I'm going to try Puppy Linux. This is one I tried a while ago and just couldn't get to grips with but now I feel it would be the best to get to know before I move on to LFS sometime next year. Why Linux? And why Debian Linux? I have tried a multitude of different distros (versions or flavours of Linux), Mandrake (now Mandriva), Fedora, Suse, Gentoo, Ubuntu (based on Debian) Slackware to name a few. There are a number that are based on one of the above like zenwalk and stax based on slackware and ubuntu and mepis based on debian which I have tried. I have come to enjoy using debian and mepis because they are stable as a rock and easy to install and straight forward to understand, and Mepis you can try without even installing. I haven't had one crash. But obviously, where I have been tinkering with the system, normally on a test install, it has crashed a few times, but it is difficult to get it to crash. It is also secure. It runs smoother than windows, it runs quicker, it is more responsive, it is more configurable, and I can do everything that I want and need to do using it. One other thing I like about Linux is that it is free, and so is the software that you can use on it. And contrary to the MS advertising bandwagon, linux is easy to install and use. I think what holds people back is the unfamilularity with it, but if people would just give it a go, they would be so surprised as it is far more intuitive than MS. I am happy with my laptop running Deian Linux and confident in its ability to do what I want it to do, and that is to just work to allow me to do my work

Technorati:

Powered by Bleezer